Theodore Dean vs Nathan Ponwith Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Jun at 04:42 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Dean vs N. Ponwith

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Dean 1 - 0 Ponwith
They have played 2 sets in total, with Theodore Dean winning 2 and Nathan Ponwith winning 0. The last match between Theodore Dean and Nathan Ponwith was at the M15 Rancho Santa Fe, 18-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Theodore Dean getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Dean | 1 |
Ponwith | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Rancho Santa Fe(06-18-25)
T. Dean vs N. Ponwith H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
64.71% (11-6) | Career Total W/L | 52.63% (190-171) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
0 | Titles | 3 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Dean vs N. Ponwith Match Preview:
- Is Ponwith or Dean better at second serve points in recent form? Ponwith significantly outperforms Dean, winning 44% compared to Dean's 0%.
- Regarding return game stats, Ponwith has an advantage, securing 44.09% of points from their opponent's second serves, while Dean again achieves 0%.
- How do they compare in first serve return stats? Ponwith captures 29.77% of points, contrasting sharply with Dean's 0% record.
- Ponwith excels under pressure, saving 52.06% of breakpoints; in contrast, Dean has not saved any.
- Recently, Dean boasts a perfect match win rate of 100%, albeit from only two matches, whereas Ponwith holds a 33.33% record.
- Which surface does each player prefer? Ponwith's best is clay with a 56% win rate, while Dean performs best on hard courts with a 75% win percentage.
- Considering tournaments, Ponwith has more experience, playing 29 matches with lower success (31.03%), while Dean, though less tested, maintains a 100% record across two Futures $10K matches.
- Ponwith has faced significantly higher-ranked opponents (average rank 349.06), whereas Dean's average opponent rank remains unknown.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Dean prevails with a 100% win rate, starkly contrasted by Ponwith's 38% performance.
- In breakpoint conversion, Ponwith edges out Dean by converting 35.2% of opportunities, while Dean has failed to convert any.
Editorial Prediction (June 18, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance, Ponwith demonstrates considerable strengths in key areas of the game, notably in second serve effectiveness, return game dominance, and breakpoint conversions. This paints a picture of a well-rounded player who can apply pressure when needed.
Conversely, Dean has shown potential with an impressive match win record, albeit from limited exposure. Their performance in deciding sets is flawless, yet their overall game metrics, particularly in return games and breakpoint opportunities, lag behind Ponwith.
Despite Dean's solid record on hard courts and unblemished match win history, Ponwith's superiority in crucial statistical areas suggests an edge. Based on these factors, Ponwith is likely favored to win the upcoming match.
Theodore Dean vs Nathan Ponwith Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Dean vs N. Ponwith H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 3 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
1:16:2 | Average Match Time | 1:16:2 |
85% (33/39) | 1st Serve % | 40% (19/47) |
76% (25/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (12/19) |
50% (3/6) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (12/28) |
43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
49% (23/47) | Return Points Win % | 28% (11/39) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Dean Recent Matches Played
N. Ponwith Recent Matches Played

T. Dean vs N. Ponwith Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
64.71% (11/6) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.63% (190/171) |
63.16% (24/14) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.81% (430/400) |
52.93% (199/177) | Games Win/Loss | 50.81% (3940/3814) |
71.43% (5/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.44% (140/122) |
60.00% (6/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.56% (40/32) |
0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37.04% (10/17) |
0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
8 | Aces Total | 745 |
0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
11 | Total Double Faults | 979 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:19:29 |
260.47 | Average Opponent Rank | 402.88 |
68% (206/301) | 1st Serve % | 58% (10325/17946) |
63% (129/206) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (6829/10325) |
44% (42/95) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3770/7621) |
31% (8/26) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (696/1695) |
35% (103/298) | Return Points Win % | 39% (6767/17453) |
0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 29.41% (20/48) |
64.71% (11/6) | Futures W/L | 58.02% (170/123) |
65% (11/17) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (189/358) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
100% (4/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (40/83) |
50% (2/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (58/108) |
100% (10/10) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (194/160) |
0% (10/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (194/34) |
14% (7/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (167/29) |